THE ANTHRAX MAILER'S MANIFESTO

                                    A BOLUS OF DUST - A CLOAK OF LIES

Perchance, have you wondered what the Anthrax Mailer
has been up to since he did the dirty deed?

"What I am suggesting is that someone with a warped mind and right-wing political leanings is the likely source of the anthrax letters."  DeWayne Wickham         USA TODAY

"The real anthrax killer
sends his condolences to Hatfill
over his crushed toe."

posted on 05/18/2003 10:52 PM PDT by The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
On: www.freerepublic.com

He has been feverishly posting his manifesto on the Internet.

He posts day and night - 24/7/365 - primarily on

                          www.Freerepublic.com

an ultra-conservative news forum and "gathering place", where he uses a variety of different "screen names" or monikers.

He did major posting under the screen name "The Great Satan" but was supposedly "banned" from the website after a half dozen of his aliases were discovered and he had a falling out with his buddy "Badabing Badaboom" -all of which was staged. As The Great Satan, he had dug himself into a hole that was so deep, the only face-saving way out was ejection from the website.

However, at the very least, another dozen aliases have not yet been "discovered" (by Freerepublic) 

or banned.

  We shall reveal them.

 



      Freerepublic is owned and operated
                   by Jim Robinson

           a virtual icon to his "Freepers"
     which are said to be some 65,000 strong.

Ultra Conservatism and political activism are the bywords at Freerepublic which some consider to be "one of the largest and.... most dangerous political forums on the Internet."

                 Operation RatherNOT!  

  http://www.fairpress.org/activism.htm

We currently have chapters in the following areas: Arizona, Arkansas Hog Wild FReepers, Atlanta Area, Buffalo NY, Capital Area, Central Illinois, Central Texas, Chicagoland, Colorado, Dallas / North Texas, Florida, Free Dominion Canada, Freeport Illinois, Fresno, Gulf Coast, Harpers Ferry Panhandle, Houston Area Texans, Indiana, Inland Northwest, Jacksonville, Kansas City Area, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Michigan, Midwest Tri-State, Minnesota, New England, New Mexico, NorCal-Capitol Area Freepers, Northern Nevada, Oklahoma, Old North State Freepers, Orange County CA, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Puget Sound, San Diego, San Francisco Bay Area, South Carolina, Tri State New York, Utah, Ventura County Conservative Forum, West Tennessee, Wisconsin If you would like to contact one of the chapters listed above,
please fill out the following form: 
FR Screen Name: 
email: 
Choose Chapter: 
Comments: 

If you already have a chapter, and would like to apply for a chapter forum, click here. If you would be interested in starting a chapter in your area, contact the Chapters Coordinator. * Note: Free Republic Network affiliated chapters are independent, locally owned and managed entities which are conditionally licensed to use the Free Republic Network web site and other resources. Licensed Chapters agree to abide by the Free Republic Network rules of organization and conduct. Opinions and content posted on affiliated chapter websites, forums and chatrooms do not neccesarily reflect the opinion of Free Republic Network. Free Republic Network assumes no liability for the postings or actions by affiliated chapters or their members. http://hail.he.net/~danger/freepnet/scripts/chapterquery.php

The Free Republic must be held accountable

Copyright © 1999, 2000, 2001 by Dan E. Moldea

On September 29, 1999, I posted an open letter at the ultra-conservative FreeRepublic.com--one of the largest and, in my opinion, most dangerous political forums on the Internet. During the four-day period prior to my letter, these Freeper-sharks had posted no fewer than a half-dozen defamatory threads about me, including, "Moldea Blackmailed Congress During Clinton's Impeachment," "The Curious Case of Dan Moldea," and "The Evil of Dan Moldea Exposed." All of these threads wound up on search engines throughout the Internet.

With the publication of my letter, I made the decision to take the time to challenge any and all such defamations with my own public responses--which would also appear on those same search engines. I advise others who have been the victims of Free Republic shark attacks to do the same. (Also see: Los Angeles Times & Washington Post v. Free Republic and Graham v. Oppenheimer.)

To date, I have received three public retractions for reckless and malicious charges leveled against me.

Here is a portion of my letter:

Over the past several months, friends and colleagues of mine have expressed their concerns about the numerous, baseless accusations of criminal activity that have been leveled against me at the Free Republic--many of which have wound up on search engines throughout the Internet. As a tribute to your effectiveness, I have admittedly been harmed by the lynch-mob atmosphere revolving around many of these posts, particularly those which have been not only false and misleading but reckless and malicious.

In short, many of you have drawn ridiculous and irresponsible conclusions about people, subjects, and events you know nothing about. And most of you have done so under false names, which is very frustrating to people, like me, who have to live with these charges without any means of making those responsible accountable for what they write.

Although I have no objection to those who use cyberspace handles for benign purposes, it is simply unfair that someone may state false facts and even allege criminal behavior anonymously. And I believe that making such statements without giving one's name is not only irresponsible but cowardly. The perennial argument that anonymity protects against retribution is lame and disingenuous.

The fact is that many of you post anonymously under your [Internet] handles (i.e. moneyrunner, sourcery, Doctor Raoul) to evade responsibility for your mindless speculations, half-baked opinions, and poorly-sourced facts. When people have no responsibility for what they say, they are apt to say anything. And the posts from the recent threads against me serve as a testament to that.

Thus, I respectfully ask those Freepers who do not accuse anonymously to stand up against those who do--and, in the process, help to curtail the venomous incivility endemic to this web site among those who disagree, especially when they are using fake names. . . .

That was the reason for my first Free Republic thread on May 19, 1999. I posted an article, "I Did Not Write 'The Mob President,'" initially on my web site and then on yours. The reason? One of your Freeper colleagues, who used an anonymous handle, had earlier posted a published story about President Clinton, called "The Mob President," and then falsely credited me with writing this piece--which I did not write and with which I completely disagreed.

After seeing my thread on the Free Republic, the person responsible did the honorable thing: [she] came online and accepted responsibility. That should have been the end of the matter, but my friends and I continued to see this story posted and reposted all over the web, still with my byline. Other than your super-responsible Alamo-Girl, who has made sincere efforts to correct this situation, I have been alone, trying to correct the record.

Consequently, over the past several days, I have been searching through Free Republic's archives and posting my side of the story on those threads in which I have been accused of something, particularly something criminal.

From now on, when someone seeks information about me on a search engine and clicks onto a Free Republic thread, they will, hopefully, get my version of events to balance the other things that have been written.

That is the sole purpose for what I have been doing here in the belly of the beast. And, not surprisingly, I have been taking a ton of grief because I have the audacity to come here and defend myself.

Even though most of you couldn't care less about me, I still ask you to do what I have always done: Stand up and identify yourself when you put something in writing.

A final note (December 2000): Obviously, I am concerned about the threat these people pose. In the midst of the 2000 presidential election, hundreds of anonymous activists within the Free Republic community appointed themselves as storm troopers for the Far Right. Not content simply to defeat Al Gore politically, they wanted to destroy him personally--in a manner not unlike the Free Republic's relentless effort against President Bill Clinton.

And they will surely continue to level false and misleading charges, anonymously, against the supporters of Clinton-Gore--while defaming at will. Already, numerous Freepers have compiled an updated "Hollywood blacklist," naming a variety of liberal celebrities. Also, although Free Republic claims not to be a hate site, it permitted Freepers to name the Democrats they hate most. And many of these Free Republic posters--including several who claim to be Christians--joked about and even encouraged the murder of journalists.

During the dramatic aftermath of the November 7 balloting, these right-wing zealots successfully organized anti-Gore rallies and protests throughout the United States. In effect, they decided to establish a clear public presence and to make FreeRepublic.com "a household name." With the election of George W. Bush, they are now embolden and will not just go away. Already, GOP activists are reaching out to Freepers and asking them to participate in a "ground war" against the anticipated critics of the new administration.

A newfound accountability for what these Freepers do and say should accompany their increased visibility. Unfortunately, it is unlikely that they will suddenly accept responsibility for their actions and statements voluntarily.

They are going to need help.


Sincerely,

Dan E. Moldea 
(Banned by the Free Republic on January 3 while trying to post a defense.)

Dan E. Moldea is an author
www.moldea.com

                                                      


      "Free Republic to Protest Rather Fair and Balanced Award"

TGS also posts on Liberty Forum under the moniker "ProjectHatfill":

(I wouldn't go there just yet - you'll get a taste below)

His subject is Steven Hatfill, the so-called "person of interest" in the anthrax mailer case, who has been mercilessly "tailed" by the FBI - 24/7, despite the total lack of a shred of evidence that he was in any way involved. 

TGS has spin-doctored a comic book tale-of-the-tailed complete with dark heroes:

"Hatfill is an actor playing a part. Hatfill isn't even guilty of the things he pretends to be guilty of. For example, he did not fake his Masters thesis research, contrary to the bogus e-mail hatfill's friend, Dr. John Michie, anonymously fed to Internet journalist Stephen Dresch. hatfill wrote that e-mail, and the two other friends of his implicated in gross misconduct by the e-mail -- Prof. Lothar Bohm, hatfill's MSc advisor. and Prof. Ralph Kirby, hatfill's PhD advisor -- both know it and are playing along with the game. At hatfill's behest, Michie also funneled stories portraying hatfill as a racist and white supremacist collaborator into the rumor mill. He is neither. hatfill didn't submit a fraudulent PhD certificate or forged recommendations from real people in his job applications to the NIH, regardless of what the documents leaked from his government personnel file purportedly demonstrate. The forgeries were generated ex post facto to support Operation Amerithrax. hatfill is in no legal jeopardy whatsoever, and he knows it. hatfill will never be executed for murder, he will never be charged with sending the anthrax letters, and no grand jury will ever be empaneled to quiz him or his associates. hatfill is not under 24x7 surveillance by the FBI, contrary to the fanciful stories put about by his personal PR flack, Pat Clawson. hatfill's unnamed girlfriend, if she even exists, was never harassed by FBI agents named Jennifer Grant and Pamela Lane. Those agents probably don't even exist. The pond-draining stunt and the jaywalking stunt were public relations exercises, designed to condition the public that the FBI were genuinely interested in hatfill, and genuinely misguided in their pursuit of him -- i.e. that our domestic "WMD" policy has been determined by one senile, out-of-control bureaucrat in the FBI's Washington Field Office, Van Harp, who conveniently just announced his retirement. The exact function of this particular play in the Bush administration's larger WMD/9-11/Iraq strategy can only be guessed at. We'll probably have a much better shot at seeing the big picture come election time."

(Note misspelling:empaneled  ) 

For those who just can't wait -
Some samplings from Satan's blog:

posted by Jef @ 12:06 PM

( "Jef" = The Great Satan)

Tuesday, November 11, 2003

Pulitzer
Patsy: Nicholas Kristof

But who set him up?

Monday, November 10, 2003

         Barbara Hatch Rosenberg

BABS
BAILS OUT

"My whole point was to make certain they were
investigating some evidence that I learnt about from people with more
knowledge than I in the case but who couldn't talk."

And who might they be, Barbara?

( EDITOR'S COMMENT: In is highly interesting to note that both Kristoff and Rosenberg are proponents 

of the rogue, American scientist theory. They simply "fingered" the wrong guy.)

See Kristoff

See Rosenberg

Satan's Blog Continued:

Sunday, November 09, 2003

HATFILL "NO LONGER A SUSPECT"

We just received the following tip from a source close to Team Hatfill (the
quote is unattributed):

"Apparently an FBI special agent in the North East has privately relayed

the information that Dr Steven Hatfill is no longer a suspect in the anthrax

investigation. All camera survielance ended last week."

 

(Note misspelling:survielance  )

Of course, the 24x7 surveillance of Hatfill, like the bugging of his
girlfriend's apartment described in Connolly's faux
against Ashcroft, is a fable as NPR's David
Kastenbaum discovered some months back:

Back at the apartment where Steven Hatfill is living, things appear quiet
these days. On four occasions this month, NPR attempted to verify claims of
FBI surveillance, but turned up only empty parked cars.

Nevertheless, the writing has been on the wall for some time:

 the Hatfill Gambit is being retired
and we suspect this report does accurately reflect the next major

 move in the charade. Most of the first-round useful
idiots have been clued in that the party's over. Our public outing 

of John Michie's role has actually helped the process along: these folks
increasingly realize they've been played for suckers.

At this point the incentive structure says that they best mumble a few
catechisms and make a low-key exit if they want to avoid looking like pathetic
dupes. Saving face is the name of the game now. It's most likely that the
useful idiots will be thrown some kind of bone to ease them through the
transition period: for example, we may hear for a while that the focus of
suspicion is still on US defence labs, not on an overseas perp. What will
happen after this transition period? Our speculation is that the new diffuse,
low-stakes cover story (a return to the old cover story used before Hatfill
was inserted to up the ante will be allowed to die on the vine over the course of the next few months or years.

 Like the Hatfill story, it will generate more heat than light but, unlike the Hatfill story, it will be impersonal and boring, a real snoozer highly functional, in context.

Will we ever hear the truth? That looks increasingly doubtful, we think. If
Bush had to cut a deal with Saddam
to get us all off the hook, then there can be no doubt but that his best
course is to let sleeping dogs lie. But even if he didn't, unless something
dreadful happens in Iraq, it's clear that Bush isn't going to need to open
this particular can of worms to win re-election. The economy is humming along,
the traumatic events of 9/11 already seem like ancient history, and most
voters figure that, if Bush felt it was necessary to invade Iraq, he probably
had a good reason, and maybe we're all happier for not knowing exactly

 what it was. Plus, a lot of lies have already been told to get us where we are
today. That's an investment that's not easily scrapped. Bottom line: don't
hold your breath waiting for Bush to come clean on the anthrax.

(Note British misspelling: defence )

In an odd and convoluted way, The Great Satan appears to have taken up for Hatfill - but why?

TGS has a penchant for role playing and 

often dons the trappings of a character 

fitting an aspect of his real personality: 

       Dr. Victor Von Doom: 

   "My Friends call me Victor."

Amerithrax said: "Submit a Tip if you have information regarding the Amerithrax investigation."

"Here's the tip:
    
Amerithrax is a hoax, a fraud, a diversion, a feint, a Potemkin Village, a sham, a scam, a PR exercise, cheap theatrics, wartime propaganda, disinformazia , a painted storefront on a Hollywood backlot, a joke, a goof, a delaying tactic, a stall, a charade, a fake, and a travesty. The purpose of Amerithrax is to temporarily distract the American people's attention from the fact that the United States is being blackmailed by Saddam Hussein with a handful of dust, and won't be able to do anything about for some time to come. The personnel of Amerithrax, such as Joyce Chiang bungler SA Bob Roth and Ruby Ridge coverup artist Van Harp, were specifically selected for incompetence and/or pliability. The Siegfried and Roy duo who were flown in to provide the bloodhound talking point used to keep this flagging story alive were specifically chosen for their suggestability and questionable professionalism, widely recognized in their own industry. The supposed "person of interest" to Amerithrax, Dr. Steven Hatfill, author of the unpublished science fiction novel Emergence, which postulates a bioterror attack on the US by Saddam Hussein behind a veil of terrorist proxies -- more or less the scenario that has come to pass, in other words -- is actually one of the authors of the Amerithrax gambit, which he conceived along with his immediate social circle of biowar specialists and Pentagon intelligence officers. Hatfill has not the slightest concern that he will ever be arrested in the anthrax deaths. Hatfill's mythical traumatized girlfriend will not be doing Larry King or Barbara Walters, Hatfill will not run out of money for legal expenses and be reduced to panhandling in the streets, because Uncle Sam is making sure he's taken care of, and the "growing sense of excitement" that John Ashcroft cited in the Amerithrax investigation four months ago will come to nothing, just as it has come to nothing in the four months since he cited it.

END TIP "

38 posted on 12/13/2002 9:21 AM PST by The Great Satan AKA Victor Von Doom AKA.......

(FROM HIS MANIFESTO)



                                                                                                                                              

I understand the concept of genetic polymorphism.

I suggest you read the article before you pontificate about this.

I refer you, in particular, to Figures 1 and 2, and the accompanying legends."

30 posted on 05/11/2002 1:55 PM PDT by The Great Satan

What if the anthrax were engineered to be resistant to certain antibiotics.
Is there a chance "piggy backing" antibiotics would offer a better chance.


I purchased Lawrence Joyce's How to Survive a Germ Warfare Attack over the web shortly after 9/11. It has a lot of info about biological agents, treatments, etc. He says that doubling up with both Cipro and Doxy could be effective against a resistant bacteria.

I know from personal, professional experience that adding antibiotic resistance to bacteria is a trivial matter -- all it takes is a $500 kit. I don't know, and haven't been able to find out, if it's as easy to engineer resistance to the new  like Cipro and Doxy as it is to penicillin or ampicillan.

70 posted on 03/17/2003 9:56 PM PST by The Great Satan (Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)

(Note the misspelling: ampicillan)

(Note the misspelling:  antiobiotics - remind you of anything?)

Are they not trying to distinguish among substrains of Ames?

"Indeed. Here's my executive summary:

The Florida anthrax could have come from lab B, C, D, or from the original USDA culture by some other route. Based on the lack of variation between them, this set of cultures most likely represents the genotype of the original, canonical, USDA Ames.

And that's all you can say, based on the genotyping evidence."